Visible

It looks like it's the same on both plans, from what I can see. There's some odd line about prioritization on the $45/mo plan, but it's still capped to 5Mbps. My latency dropped significantly though, which made it feel much snappier.

I’m sure they do that to catch the eye. Pretty sneaky, but then their competitors do the same thing.

I don't work for Visible, so I can't exactly answer the question. However, I can say this: the $30/mo plan will give you what's left over as far as bandwidth (speed) goes. When all the premium customers (Verizon postpaid/prepaid, Visible+ users) have...

@marciano wrote:Heck, since Visible is a subsidiary of Verizon, did I really jump ship? That's certainly true! It's all Verizon in the end. @marciano wrote:I checked. Verizon's top plan asks for $55 plus tax and fees. Suppose they are $5, the total ...

I'm not on the top plan. Further, Cricket does prioritize customers lower than those who pay AT&T full price. It's how the industry works. We pay less, so we get less — but in my head, it's still a good deal. I'd rather pay $30/mo for okay speeds tha...